Catching up on The Bloggess, and I just learned that raccoons don't have saliva. Granted, comments of the day from Bloggess readers are not the most reliable sources of zoological information (does zoology include saliva?), but, even if that's totally made up, isn't the thought of a saliva-less mouth really weird? Like sort of unimaginable? From the mouth perspective, anyway? I mean we have seen snake and chameleon tongues, and, even if snakes and chamelons do have saliva, it looks to me like they don't, so my imagination can clearly handle the concept. If a reptile is involved. Or a fish, I guess. Though I wonder if it's fair to call those things in the toungue-place in fish-mouths tongues. Might we be anthropromorphizing, and the real function of the fishy-tonguey-thing is short term memory? Though maybe it's not fair of me to define tongue so narrowly. Who said tongues had to taste, and weren't allowed to remember or farm water-aphids? If water-aphids exist and are beneficial to certain fish and their saliva-less raccoon tongues.
Ok. Enough. Sorry. I get like this when I read
The Bloggess. It's weird.